Prevalans the results of the vehicle spontaneous combustion survey and launch the safe method of the battery

　　Author ：Iflowpower – Portable Power Station Supplier

Although, in the past few years, the heat of new energy cars is increasing, but it seems that there is no such "fire". On April 21, Tesla, underground parking garage in Shanghai, was spontaneous and then exploded. Just on the 22nd of the next day, a military ES8 was in Xi'an, and the service center suddenly spontaneously.

At the time of electric vehicle spontaneous combustion event, only one day. Good in two self-ignition events, no casualties. For new energy cars, as emerging things, new energy cars are still still immature, there are still some shortcomings and urgent issues, so some problems are also difficult.

But for the car company, the response and strategy of these emergencies in the face of the product is especially important for the embodiment of this car company for consumer responsibility. In the case of this self-ignition, the performance of the awareness is obviously more than the Tesla. 蔚 来: Public investigation conclusions, and launch a sudden self-ignition incident that guarantees the battery security program April 22nd, and for this incident, it is also a declaration in a few hours, confirming that there is no casualty.

And it is expressed that the results will be announced in a timely manner. In fact, it is also true that the results announced in the first time. On April 30, only the time of the past week, the official officially announced the corresponding accident indication and survey results of the self-ignition event on Weibo.

It is said that the ES8, which appeared in the case, has suffered a violent impact before spontaneous combustion, resulting in a large-area deformation of the left rear outer casing of the power battery. This also directly leads to the internal structure of the battery pack in a state of being squeezed. After a certain amount of time, a short circuit is formed, so that the vehicle is spontaneous.

Therefore, it is aware that the cause of the accident is the impact of ES8. And after explaining the reasons, it is also aimed at this time that spontaneous combustion is about the safety of batteries, and the "Action Plan for Further Protection Battery Safety" includes five measures. 1.

Enhance the emergency response mechanism: If the vehicle collides during the driving process, or the owner contacts the car hotline, the owner will go to the scene to check the vehicle at the scene; 2. Increase the bottom plate of the battery pack Work Project: In addition to the appearance of the existing battery pack, you will continue to take a separate work item of the vehicle lifting inspection battery pack bottom plate in addition to the maintenance or maintenance of the existing battery pack; The check of the battery pack bottom plate: At present, when the vehicle is exchanged, the staff will perform artificial inspection of the vehicle battery pack bottom plate, and fully inspected the battery of other electrical properties. Since then, the car will further strengthen the battery pack inspection process in the power-on and one-click power supply service, and increase the necessary technical assistance means.

4, free replacement of battery packs with safety hazards: If the vehicle battery pack has been hit, it is found to have a safety hidden danger. It is a car to replace the same specification for free of the vehicle free of charge, and scrapped for the replaced battery pack deal with. 5.

Carry out fire drills, strengthen security awareness: Jewa will strengthen employee fire safety awareness and emergency disposal ability. At the same time, it will also cooperate with fire and rescue units to do a good job in emergency disposal ability. It can be seen that it is really rapidly in dealing with the self-ignition event.

In the first time, it is necessary to have a reason for the accident after a week, and give the appropriate plan Preventive measures. Whether in strengthening emergency response mechanisms, or free of replacement of hidden dangers, it is also relatively comprehensive. At this point, it reflects the attitude of it is responsible for consumers.

Tesla: The result of the accident has not yet been announced, Mask "Sanlian asked" took the lead in attacking Tesla's self-ignition event in the evening of April 21, for this incident, Tesla officially issued a statement at 7 o'clock in the morning of the next morning. It is worth noting that although there is no casualties in the statement, it has not mentioned the cause of the accident. On the other day, Teslaga did not do any statement about this self-ignition.

And Tesla CEO Elon Mask did not even think of it, and three twitches were sent, saying that the media is targeting electric vehicles and even target Tesla's "double standard". Mask wrote in his pusher: "" There are more than one million internal combustion locomotives (good name!) Every year, causing thousands of people to die, but Tesla's fire event and no one is the biggest Headline news, why do you engage in double standards? This is a real problem. "The meaning is that why there are more than one million internal combustion engines every year, but the headline is always Tesla.

And he immediately issued a second propelion. He said: "The truth is that Tesla is like most electric cars, the possibility of fire is 500% lower than the internal combustion control, and the latter carries a large amount of flammable fuels. Why never mention this? "In the third essay, Mask also said:" When you read about Tesla's double standard article, why?.

Maybe there is an uneven reason. "Although, as a" new power of the car "in the United States, it is indeed unusual attention to the media for" new "things. However, Tesla has more than 50 self-combustion accidents that appear in 2013, but it is true, no matter how to say, Tesla should recognize these issues, and actively respond, not in the pusher Talk about the "probability" problem.

Just like the owner of the Tesla spontaneous fire accident, the recently said in Weibo: "No matter how low it in the total self-ignition of Tesla, 100% for me is 100%. For the lives of consumers, can you use a percentage to a bunch? "The accident is an accident, an introduction and percentage is never taken to measure the life of consumers. Today, according to the accident, the content of Tesla officially updated, but no mention about the information about the self-ignition event, the whole thing is like not happening, All people forgotten, including Tesla.

And similar to this incident, it is not the first time. Time traced back to two months ago, on March 26 this year, in Guangzhou's self-ignition, until Today Tes came to announce the cause of the accident to the outside world. That is, there is another happening of the three incidents.

Tesla has never given reasonable explanation, and there is only the outside world to have a harder question. Therefore, even if it is back, the media is indeed too concerned about Tesla, even a little critical, which is also caused by the behavior of not responsible for consumers. Conclusion The popularity and promotion of new energy vehicles have many bottlenecks, and two sudden spontaneous spontaneous spontaneous spontanes in the nearly Japan have made consumers.

At this point, the car company is to do "", "", rather than negative, or even. It is very disappointed with Tesla's attitude and practice in dealing with a series of spontaneous combustion accidents. Compared to Tesla "three-linked asked", it is obvious to apologize and deal with the attitude and way of handling the accident.

Cowbral network.